An Ideas Breakdown On Important Aspects In
News n00bs: The quest for new audiences has taken The Washington Post to the streaming platform Twitch “It’s like a version of C-SPAN for a younger audience.” By Marlee Baldridge July 17, 2018, 9:39 a.m. Twitch : It’s not just for Fortnite battle royales anymore. The Washington Post tried out broadcasting on the streaming platform best known for gaming yesterday with content related to politics — which is its own battle royale, really. The Post’s plans for the platform include “postgame” coverage of major news events hosted by political reporter Libby Casey and a series called Playing Games with Politicians, in which political reporter Dave Weigel will interview politicians while playing video games. On Monday, the Post streamed coverage of Donald Trump’s meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Twitch — which is owned by Amazon, whose CEO Jeff Bezos owns The Washington Post — can be thought of as a cross between YouTube and a Reddit AMA. Accounts host live video feeds of content (usually video games) and viewers speak to each other in a chat feature. (If anyone’s actually watching .) It has 15 million daily active users and over 2.2 million broadcasters; 81.5 percent of users are male, and 55 percent are between the ages of 18 and 34 — in other words, a hard-to-reach demographic for political news. Video game journalists frequently use Twitch to review games or cover conferences like E3, but political coverage is less common.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit http://www.niemanlab.org/2018/07/news-n00bs-the-quest-for-new-audiences-had-taken-the-washington-post-to-the-streaming-platform-twitch/
He has written tirades against diversity and Islam, arguing that the former is “a source of weakness, tension and disunion” and that the latter is “incompatible with the modern West.” He also defended the notorious America First Committee, which tried to prevent the US from entering Wold War II using anti-semitic propaganda . Bill Kristol, of all people, compared Anton to prominent Nazi Carl Schmitt. Even Jonathan Chait—who usually saves his ire for the truly powerful, college students —has called him an authoritarian . Knowing this, the Washington Post, defender of democracy, decided to publish Anton’s argument for ending one of the few American traditions that contains any glimmer of compassion for immigrants. In the piece, Anton argues against the common interpretation of the 14th Amendment which was written to give citizenship rights to newly freed slaves, and that is the constitutional basis for birthright citizenship. Anton argues for a version of America that’s antithetical to what the Washington Post professes to support. He calls America not a country of immigrants, but a country of “settlers” who can choose to exclude immigrants at any time. He writes that America’s policy of birthright citizenship is a “magnet” for the “world’s poor” and allows our citizenship to be “debased.” These arguments are inconsistent with a vision of American democracy that represents actual Americans, fewer and fewer of whom are white . This is exactly the fear of Anton, white supremacist Richard Spencer, and others who see their supremacy as white Americans slipping away. How will they achieve their goal of a majority white America through democracy? They can’t.
For the original version including any supplementary images or video, visit https://splinternews.com/white-supremacy-thrives-in-darkness-1827704781